My interest in athletic
administration at the collegiate level drives me to learn about different
problematic issues. It seems that money is at the center of many problems,
especially regarding the level of competition. The highest level, Division 1-A,
brings about many pressures related to the creation of revenue. From an
administrative standpoint, this fact leads me to believe that a staff must have
an efficient chain of command when handling these money matters. The pinnacle
of the chain is the head athletic director, who receives valuable input from
associate and assistant directors underneath him/her. Kerwin & Doherty
found that “The 1A environment is typically characterized by complex decisions,
short timelines, and scarce resources that can lead to emotionally-charged
decision making” (pg. 224).1 Administrative pressure to perform is
vital to the overall success of an NCAA athletic program.
An athletic administrative staff must carry a competent
accountability system in which checks and balances are a priority. The staff
must work directly with the institution itself in order to maintain a high
level of integrity regarding money management. Suggs noted “But the problem
remains of having no way to verify the data that institutions submit, and
institutions continue to have differences in their accounting that make
comparisons between and among institutions problematic at best” (pg. 18).2
Both of these managerial challenges directly reveal the effectiveness of an
athletic administration working behind the scenes and should stimulate staff
members daily to perform at a high level. The ultimate athletic administrator
thrives in challenging situations consistently by creating educated and
informed decisions related to money issues such as these.
References
1Kerwin, S. &
Doherty, A. (2012). An investigation of the conflict triggering process in
intercollegiate athletic departments. Journal
of Sport Management, 26(3), 224-236.
2Suggs, W.
(2009). Old challenges and new opportunities for studying the financial aspects
of intercollegiate athletics. New
Directions for Higher Education, 148, 11-22. DOI: 10.1002/he.364
No comments:
Post a Comment